Already a subscriber? Log in .
You've reached your limit of one free article.
You can cancel anytime .
SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS
Exclusive International news coverage
Ad-free experience NEW
Weekly digital Magazine NEW
9 daily & weekly Newsletters
Access to Worldcrunch archives
30-days free access, then
$2.90
per month.
Subscribe to Worldcrunch
$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90. Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Post is an ad-free social platform built for news. Join to access premium content from Worldcrunch and 100+
other trusted publishers.
Post is an ad-free social platform built for news.
Read On Post for Free
You've reached your limit of free articles.
To read the full story, start your free trial today.
Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.
Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.
Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.
Already a subscriber? Log in
A school in Lagos, Nigeria
Last September, after a heated debate, West Virginia university decided to eliminate the foreign languages and literatures department, replacing it with an online app. In some cases, even English proficiency is declining: in France, half of children finishing secondary school do not reach the minimum level required (A2) by the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, a system developed by the Council of Europe.
Beyond the factors that could explain this disaffection -- the pandemic that has fragmented education at all levels, the cuts suffered by the disciplines of the humanities -- it is clear that the younger generation is giving up on learning languages just as machine translation becomes ubiquitous on the Internet (in social media apps, messaging services, streaming platforms).
In the very near future, it may enter the daily lives of billions of people.
Jacqueline Brandwayn/Unsplash
Technology of course has limitations. It works well with English, Mandarin, Arabic and French -- for which there are huge amounts of digitized texts and recorded speeches (almost always transcribed) -- and less well with languages with little online presence such as Swahili and Urdu.
According to most studies in which native speakers have been involved, it does not do well when confronted with literature either: it offers acceptable translations of only about 30% of excerpts from novels (usually simple passages). This is because it is less adept at finding creative solutions that preserve aspects of a book that are difficult to quantify, such as style, rhythm, wit, sensibility.
Teachers' attention should shift from grammar exercises to understanding practices and cultures.
In addition, it may be questionable to employ technology in sensitive situations, for example, to translate interviews of asylum seekers and testimonies coming from conflict zones.
There is also a risk of exaggerating its successes. To promote itself on social media, Jumpspeak, a language learning app similar to Duolingo and Babbel, has made advertisements in which an AI-generated person reads computer-translated sentences: "I struggled with languages all my life. Then I learned Spanish in six months. I was offered a job in France and learned French. I learned Mandarin before I visited China." With each sentence, it switches from one language to another.
Leaving aside the weaknesses and far-fetched promises, we nonetheless can take it for granted that machine translators will far exceed the technical skills of the average language graduate. Then the conclusion shared by many experts in education and linguistics is that teachers' attention should shift from grammar exercises to understanding the practices and cultures embedded in various contexts.
Valerie Trapp, another Atlantic reporter, says her approach was roughly this. Spanish was the first language she learned, spending her early childhood in the Dominican Republic, but when she moved to the United States as a child, she practically abandoned it for English.
Back in Santo Domingo as an adult, she found that her Spanish sounded "a little outdated" and that she struggled to express a personality with her peers. To catch up, she dived into slang and self-imposed the study of reggaeton. Quickly, she saw a new level of comfort and colloquialism in her Spanish that she might not get from an app. "Language is not a rigid algorithm to decode. It is fluid, changeable and heterogeneous."
Slang connects us to the current version of a culture.
The creative intricacies of slang challenge machine translation models but uniquely attract our interest. In the essay Slang: The People's Poetry Michael Adams, professor of English at Indiana University, cites a study that measured the brain activity of some people as they read Shakespeare's Coriolanus. The researchers found that when language was used in the play in a more original way, for example if a noun was turned into a verb, the brain became more activated. This expedient falls under what linguists call functional shifting, and is also how slang works.
Slang, in other words, can connect us to a current, if impermanent, version of a culture. For others who may be confronted with learning their family's language of origin, the experience helps to discover unexplored parts of themselves. But all of us should remember what may be most valuable about learning a foreign language is simply how much fun it is.
The latest
